Legal Opinion
Timbisha Shoshone Tribe v. Kennedy
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 3, 2009No. Case CV F 09-1248 LJO SMSPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION MOTION
LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge.
Introduction
Plaintiffs Timbisha Shoshone Tribe (“Tribe”), 1 Edward Beaman (“Mr. Beaman”), Virginia Beck (“Ms. Beck”), and Cleaveland Lyle Casey (“Mr. Casey”) (“collectively Plaintiffs”) move for a preliminary injunction, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 65, against defendants Joseph Kennedy (“Mr. Kennedy”), Madeline Esteves (“Ms. Esteves”), Pauline Esteves, Angela Boland (“Ms. Bond”), and Erick Mason (“Mr. Mason”) (collectively “Defendants”). For the following reasons, this Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion for…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Aurora World, Inc. v. Ty Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Healy Lake Village v. Mt. McKinley BankAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Timbisha Shoshone Tribe v. SalazarDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Rubin v. Vista Del Sol Health Services, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Hammond v. JewellDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.