Legal Opinion
Timbisha Shoshone Tribe v. Salazar
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 16, 2010No. Case CV F 09-2230 LJO SMSPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION MOTION (Doc. 11)
LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge.
Introduction
Plaintiffs Timbisha Shoshone Tribe (“Tribe”), 1 Edward Beaman (“Mr. Beaman”), Virginia Beck (“Ms. Beck”), Cleave-land Lyle Casey (“Mr. Casey”), George Gholson (“Mr. Gholson”), Margaret Cortez (“Ms. Cortez”), and Bill Eddy (“Mr. Eddy”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) move for a preliminary injunction, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 65, against federal defendants Ken Salazar, Larry Echo Hawk, Dale Morris, and the United States Department of the Interior (collectively “the BIA”). Plaintiffs seek an…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Munaf v. GerenSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Villegas v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2013
- Villegas v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2013
- (PS)Penta v. BondDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Bermudez v. SN Servicing CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Brennan v. DiazDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.