State v. Black
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtEkviN, J.
The defendants elicited the testimony relating to the delay in the commencement of the prosecution against them as an implied admission by conduct on the part of the State’s witnesses that they were conscious of the weakness of the State’s case against the defendants. Consequently, it became proper for the State to explain the delay, and to show that the inference which the defendants sought to draw from it was not warranted by the circumstances. Collins v. R. R., 187 N.C. 141, 120 S.E. 824; McCraw v. Insurance Co., 78 N.C. 149; Wigmore on Evidence (3rd Ed.), section 284; Stansbury’s North…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Brown v. . Montgomery Ward Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- State v. . LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Bailey v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. . DilliardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. . GentrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. IrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. AverySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. MaynardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. AlbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.