Legal Opinion

Brown v. . Montgomery Ward Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 10, 1940PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

The duty of proprietors of buildings with respect to Invitees on their premises has been frequently stated in the decisions of this Court (Bowden v. Kress, 198 N. C., 559, 152 S. E., 625; Anderson v. Amusement Co., 213 N. C., 130, 195 S. E., 386), and in those of •other jurisdictions (Kresge v. Fader, 116 Ohio St., 718, 58 A. L. R., 132). Tbe concensus of these authorities is that the occupant of premises to which others are invited to come for business or pleasure owes to* such persons the duty to exercise due care to keep the premises in a reasonably safe condition and to give warning of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. S. S. Kresge Co. v. FaderOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Robinson v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Hubbard v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Smith v. N. C. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
  5. Bowden v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Coach Co. v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Early v. EleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Fanelty v. Rogers Jewelers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Queen City Coach Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Powell v. DEIFELLS, INCORPORATEDSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API