Legal Opinion

Bailey v. North Carolina Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1943PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSgheNCK, J.

Having reached tbe conclusion we bave in tbis case it may be conceded, though it is not decided, that tbe defendant was negligent in not giving warning of tbe approach of its train by bell or whistle, in exceeding tbe speed limit fixed by municipal ordinance and in allowing tbe railroad bed at tbe crossing to become rough by reason of tbe rails being exposed from two and half to three inches in height and of holes therein.

Tbe evidence shows that Mulberry Street runs east and west parallel to and immediately north of the railroad track, on the railroad right-of-way, and that a person traveling…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Harrison v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Godwin v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Cooper v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Norton v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Exum v. BoylesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Ingram v. . Smoky Mountain Stages, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Vernon v. CristSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Wagoner v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API