Legal Opinion

Trans Alaska Pipeline Rate Cases

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 6, 1978No. 77-452PublishedCited by 324 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

The primary question presented in these cases is whether the Interstate Commerce Commission is authorized by § 15 (7) of the Interstate Commerce Act, as added, 36 Stat. 552, and amended, 49 U. S. C. § 15 (7), 1 to suspend initial tariff schedules of an interstate carrier subject to Part I of the Act, 24 Stat. 379, as amended, 49 U. S. C. §§ 1-27 (1970 ed. and Supp. V). In addition, we are asked to decide whether, if the Commission is so authorized, it has additional authority summarily to fix maximum interim tariff rates which will be allowed to go into effect during the suspension period and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by324 opinions

  1. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Mansell v. MansellSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Hicklin v. OrbeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

319 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API