Legal Opinion

Huntington Landmark Adult Community Ass'n v. Ross

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 1989No. G006409PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCOVILLE, P. J.

Defendants Shermoen and Ross appeal from an order denying their motion for new trial and from a judgment against them on plaintiff Huntington Landmark Adult Community Association’s (HLAC) suit for injunctive and declaratory relief seeking to enforce age restrictions in the association’s covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&R’s) as amended in June 1986 to conform to Civil Code section 51 et seq.

Facts

HLAC, a condominium project located in Huntington Beach, was built in the early 1970’s. As originally written, the CC&R’s pertaining to the project contained an age…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Marina Point, Ltd. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. O'CONNOR v. Village Green Owners Assn.California Supreme Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Founding Members of Newport Beach Country Club v. Newport Beach Country Club, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Whyte v. Schlage Lock CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Heather Farms Homeowners Assn. v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Oviedo v. Windsor Twelve Properties, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API