Heather Farms Homeowners Assn. v. Robinson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERSON, P. J.
In this case, we hold that a trial court has the authority to determine the identity of the “prevailing party” in litigation, within the meaning of Civil Code 1 section 1354, for purposes of awarding attorney fees; and that a defendant dismissed without prejudice in an action to enforce equitable servitudes thereunder is not, ipso facto, such prevailing party.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
This is a dispute over attorney fees incurred in an action to enforce the covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&R’s) which govern a residential planned unit development in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Donald v. Cafe Royale, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Isobe v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- McLarand, Vasquez & Partners, Inc. v. Downey Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Huntington Landmark Adult Community Ass'n v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Winick Corp. v. Safeco Insursnce Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- ComputerXpress, Inc. v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Graciano v. Robinson Ford Sales, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Sears v. BaccaglioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- deSaulles v. Community Hospital of the Monterey PeninsulaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Villa De Las Palmas Homeowners Ass'n v. TerifajCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.