Legal Opinion

Tarczynski v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PR CO.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1952PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

261 Wis. 149 (1952)

TARCZYNSKI, Appellant,

vs.

CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY and others, Defendants:

SNARSKI, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 5, 1952.

March 4, 1952.

For the appellant there were briefs by Milton M. Blumenthal of Chicago, Illinois, attorney, and Henry C. Friend and Harry S. Sicula of Milwaukee of counsel, and oral argument by Mr. Sicula and Mr. Friend.

For the respondent there was a brief by Kenney, Korf & Pfeil of Elkhorn, and oral argument by Francis J. Korf.

FRITZ, C. J.

The plaintiff, Victoria Tarczynski, commenced an action in the circuit…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Brown v. Fletcher's EstateSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Leighton v. RoperNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  5. Oviatt, Administrator v. GarretsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Guerra De Chapa v. AllenDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1954
  2. State Ex Rel. Sullivan v. CrossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  3. Rosenthal v. RosenthalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Oldenburg v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Brooks Ex Rel. Brooks v. National BankDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API