Rosenthal v. Rosenthal
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.
The issue is whether the trial court had jurisdiction. If the action is one to compel support by the husband, personal service on him in Wisconsin is required; however, if the action is one for legal separation, the jurisdiction of the court may be based upon service on a defendant outside of the state and by publication of the summons.
Ch. 595, Laws of 1959, made important changes in the laws governing marriage and divorce. The new Family Code became effective January 1, 1960, except for actions affecting marriage commenced prior to that date. The Family Code existing on January 1, 1960,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dyer v. . DyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Williams v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1928
- Miyoi v. Gold Bond Stamp Co. Employees Retirement TrustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Gilbert v. HaywardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1914
- Renner v. RennerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Heifetz v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Johnson v. Cintas Corp. No. 2Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- Canadian Pacific Ltd. v. Omark-Prentice Hydraulics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978
- Dunn v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978
- Milwaukee County v. Schmidt, Garden & EriksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.