Legal Opinion

State v. Baird

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 9, 1996No. 35019-6-IPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllington, J.

One morning after James Thomas Baird and his wife, Susan, had coffee together, Baird followed Susan upstairs, beat her unconscious, then surgically disfigured her face. At trial, Baird offered evidence of an illegally-recorded conversation which Baird claimed triggered the assault. This case requires us to confront, for the first time, the competing interests involved when a criminal defendant offers evidence obtained in violation of the Privacy Act. Because we conclude that Baird’s right to present his defense was not compromised by exclusion of the evidence, and that other evidence rulings…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. State v. FjermestadWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. RikerWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. RitchieWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. OxborrowWashington Supreme Court · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. MasonWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. MasonWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. EllisWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In re the Estate of BairdWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API