Legal Opinion

State v. Fjermestad

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1990No. 56277-6PublishedCited by 146 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallow, C.J.

— This case was certified to this court by the Court of Appeals pursuant to RCW 2.06.030(d) because of its broad public import. The issue presented is whether the use of an electronic body wire by detectives, without court authorization and in violation of Washington's privacy act, RCW 9.73, renders all evidence of the transaction inadmissible and thus mandates dismissal. We hold that it does and reverse the defendant's conviction.

The facts are uncomplicated. The Clark County Sheriff's office conducted a 7-month investigation which was aimed at arresting drug dealers.1 The operation was code…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. WanrowWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. StannardWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. O'NEILLWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by146 opinions

  1. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Bowles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Lacey Nursing Center, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Kadoranian v. Bellingham Police DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. WentzWashington Supreme Court · 2003

141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API