Legal Opinion

State v. Ritchie

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1995No. 61175-1; 61237-4; 61361-3PublishedCited by 136 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brachtenbach, J.*

— These cases involve exceptional sentences above the standard range. State v. Scott, 72 Wn. App. 207, 866 P.2d 1258 (1993); State v. Hamrick, unpublished decision noted at 71 Wn. App. 1071 (1993), review granted, 125 Wn.2d 1007 (1994); and State v. Ritchie, unpublished commissioner’s decision, review granted, 125 Wn.2d 1007 (1994). We granted petitions for review, but limited review to the length of the exceptional sentence. We affirm in each case.

Defendants and amicus curiae urge that we judicially impose requirements and limitations on the length of excep*391tional sentences…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. DunawayWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Allingham v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. OxborrowWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. PryorWashington Supreme Court · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by136 opinions

  1. State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. O'DellWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. BranchWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1997

131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API