Legal Opinion

State v. Oxborrow

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1986No. 51339-2PublishedCited by 124 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

Kenneth D. Oxborrow challenges the trial court's imposition of consecutive 10- and 5-year prison terms under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 (the SRA), RCW 9.94A, for the crimes of first degree theft and violation of a cease and desist order in connection with the sale of securities. Oxborrow was sentenced for activities related to a pyramid scheme in which he defrauded investors of over $58 million. Oxborrow claims that the sentences imposed are clearly excessive, that the trial court lacked authority to impose consecutive sentences, and that the trial court relied on impermissible…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. NordbyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. ArmstrongWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. State v. HerbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. State v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by124 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. DunawayWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. FisherWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. RitchieWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. CraneWashington Supreme Court · 1991

119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API