Legal Opinion

Direct Plumbing Supply Co. v. City of Dayton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1941No. 28354PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBettman, J.

The question here involved is whether an ordinance of the city of Dayton requiring sellers of plumbing fixtures to attach certain labels to fixtures sold, and to report weekly to the public authorities all sales of fixtures, the names and addresses of purchasers, and places of proposed installation, is a valid exercise of the police power. This question is presented upon the pleadings in the case, which contain the admitted terms of the ordinance. Evidence of the operation of a previous similar ordinance was submitted to the courts below, but is not before this court. Nevertheless, it will be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pritz v. MesserOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. City of Youngstown v. Kahn Bros. Building Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Holsman v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Olds v. KlotzOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  5. City of Dayton v. S. S. Kresge Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Arbino v. Johnson & JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State ex rel. Heller v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Groch v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. Aalim (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API