City of Youngstown v. Kahn Bros. Building Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
The plaintiff in error contends that the building contemplated by the defendants in error violates the so-called zoning ordinance of the city of Youngstown, and that the Court of Appeals therefore erred in making the injunction perpetual.
The defendant in error contends that the ordinance is unconstitutional, in that it contravenes provisions of both the federal and state Constitutions, namely, the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, which provides, “Nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law,” and Article I,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Haller Sign Works v. Physical Culture Training SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
- State ex rel. Westminster Presbyterian Church v. EdgecombNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- City of St. Louis v. EvraiffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
- Ingersoll v. Village of South OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1924
3Cited by49 opinions
- Lombardo v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Direct Plumbing Supply Co. v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1941
- Leary v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- City of North Muskegon v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Village of Hudson v. Albrecht, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.