Legal Opinion
Arbino v. Johnson & Johnson
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 27, 2007No. 2006-1212PublishedCited by 215 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
I. Introduction
{¶ 1} Petitioner Melisa Arbino initiated a products-liability action against respondents Johnson & Johnson, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc., and John*469son & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C. (collectively, “Johnson & Johnson”) in 2006. She alleges that she suffered blood clots and other serious medical side effects from using the Ortho Evra Birth Control Patch, a hormonal birth-control medication that Johnson & Johnson created.
{¶ 2} The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. Arbino’s complaint contains…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by215 opinions
- State v. BodykeOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. Henderson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. DelvallieOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Groch v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. Aalim (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
210 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.