Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Enz

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 21, 1966No. Docket 470PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtT. G. Kavanagh, J.

The plaintiffs are owners of lots on Gun lake in Allegan and Barry counties in beautiful western Michigan.

The defendants are land contract purchasers of a large parcel of land abutting Gun lake which they propose to subdivide into 111 to 153 lots. According to the proposed plat there will be approximately 16 lots in the new subdivision which will border Gun lake and the remaining lots will have access to the lake by means of canals which will be dug by the subdividers.

The plaintiffs filed suit claiming that defendants’ proposed development would constitute an illegal invasion of their…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hilt v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Anaheim Union Water Co. v. Fuller.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Verdugo Ca&209on Water Co. v. VerdugoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Beach v. HaynerMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Strong v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pierce v. RileyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Donovan Construction Co. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Donovan Construction Co. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Thompson v. EnzMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Thompson v. EnzMichigan Supreme Court · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API