Strong v. Baldwin
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the superior court of Los; Angeles County and from an order. refusing a new trial-N. P. Conrey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This action was instituted by Harriet W. R. Strong and Julius B. Cohn, the owners of certain parcels of land in the Rancho Paso de Bartolo Viejo, sometimes-known and hereinafter designated as the Ranchito, in Los-Angeles County, against E. J. Baldwin and H. A. Unruh (who is simply an agent of said Baldwin and has no other-interest in the subject-matter of the litigation), to obtain a. decree enjoining them from interfering with plaintiffs in their use and control of a certain water ditch known as theRineon ditch, connecting with the San Gabriel River at a. point on the Rancho la Puente, which…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bathgate v. IrvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Anaheim Union Water Co. v. Fuller.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Verdugo Ca&209on Water Co. v. VerdugoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Cannon v. StockmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Hesperia Land & Water Co. v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- City of Santa Maria v. AdamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Rancho Santa Margarita v. VailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Thompson v. EnzMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
- Copeland v. Fairview Land & Water Co. & Lake Hemet Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Miller v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.