Legal Opinion
Rodriquez v. Maryland Indemnity Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided August 14, 1975No. 1 CA-CIV 2579PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OGG, Presiding Judge.
The plaintiff-appellee Maryland Indemnity Insurance Company brought a declaratory judgment action to determine what coverage applied to the defendants-appellants Rodriquez under an insurance policy issued by the Insurance Company to Rodriquez. The specific question is whether there was coverage under the uninsured motorist provisions of the policy. Both parties moved for summary judgment and the court ruled for the Insurance Company, denying any coverage to Rodriquez under the policy. Rodriquez brings this appeal.
The agreed statement of facts are essentially :
On…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1971
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Hinkel Ex Rel. HinkelNevada Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. TwohigNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- Shipley v. American Standard Insurance Co. of Wis.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1968
- Holcomb v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. BlakelyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Cardin v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Smith v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Federated American Insurance v. RaynesWashington Supreme Court · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.