Legal Opinion

Smith v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 7, 1991No. 130A90PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Justice.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the underinsured motorist (UIM) coverages provided in two separate automobile insurance policies issued to the individual plaintiff may not be aggregated or “stacked” to compensate for the death of his daughter who was killed while driving a vehicle owned by the individual plaintiff and the daughter, given that the daughter and the vehicle were listed in only one of the policies. The Court of Appeals, while acknowledging that a different result might be reached if writing on a clean slate,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Bradley v. Mid-Century InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Frank v. Horizon Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  5. Crowder v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Sproles v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. MabeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Harris v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Hlasnick v. Federated Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, in 90-1534 v. Earl D. Hampton, Jr., Earl D. Hampton, Sr. And Barbara Hampton, in 90-1523Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API