Legal Opinion
Royal Indemnity Co. v. Blakely
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 3, 1977PublishedCited by 116 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
The defendant Donald E. Blakely, Jr. (Blakely), was struck and injured by an uninsured (hit- and-run) motor vehicle in March, 1973, while riding in a Plymouth automobile owned by his father and insured by Royal Indemnity Company (Royal). At that time Blakely *87lived with his parents, each of whom owned one other motor vehicle which was insured by Royal under a separate standard motor vehicle policy. Blakely claims that he is entitled to collect under the uninsured motor vehicle insurance coverage on each of the three motor vehicle insurance policies issued by Royal. Royal has conceded liability…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Board of Education v. Assessor of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Nygaard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Town of Milton v. Civil Service CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Green v. Board of Appeal of NorwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. EalySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by116 opinions
- Mullins v. Pine Manor CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- International Fidelity Insurance v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Leardi v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Marashlian v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Paro v. Longwood HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.