East 7th Street Realty Corp. v. Damm
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Per curiam
Section 205 of the Housing and Rent Act of 1947 (U. S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 1895) created a cause of action unknown at common law. The period of limitation set up therein is regarded as a matter of substance limiting the right as well as the remedy, and the filing of a suit within the prescribed period of one year is a condition precedent to recovery. The cause of action set forth in the counterclaim was extinguished after the running of the statutory period (Osbourne v. United States, 164 F. 2d 767; Citrone v. Palladino, 77 N. Y. S. 2d 489; Hill v. Board of Supervisors of Rensselaer…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- The HarrisburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Osbourne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Hill v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- United States v. BoomerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
3Cited by3 opinions
- Maurizio v. GoldsmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Central Asphalt, Inc. v. Industrial BankNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Hart v. LeihyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1954