Legal Opinion

Hart v. Leihy

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided July 22, 1954No. 8221PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITTAKER, District Judge.

This is an action under the National Housing and Rent Act1, and more particularly under Section 1895 of that Act, by a tenant to recover damages in treble the amount of excessive rents claimed to have been paid to and received and retained by the defendant-landlord for the use and occupancy of a “controlled housing accommodation”, in Kansas City, during a period “beginning in March of 1952 and continuing until and including March of 1953”, and for reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.

The matter is now before me upon plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, under Rule…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Leimer v. Woods, Housing ExpediterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
  2. Berry v. HellerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Young v. MargiottaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  4. Magnotta v. LeonardDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Gulden v. BermanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Severo Vargas v. SánchezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1957
  2. Vargas v. SánchezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API