Legal Opinion

Central Asphalt, Inc. v. Industrial Bank

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenry A. Hudson, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, which was made at the opening of the trial of this case.

The action is brought by Central Asphalt, Inc., a materialman, for materials furnished to Eagle Contractors of Utica, Inc., subcontractors to Peerless Construction Co., prime contractor, under a construction contract with the United States Government for an unpaid balance due it from the subcontractor Eagle Contractors on such materials. The action is directed against funds held for the Industrial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Osbourne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  2. Hill v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. United States v. BoomerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
  4. Belknap Hardware &. Mfg. Co. v. Ohio River Contract Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1920
  5. East 7th Street Realty Corp. v. DammAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1949

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maurizio v. GoldsmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  2. Gichner v. Insurance Companies of North AmericaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API