Legal Opinion

State v. Lynn

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1966No. 39368PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

Appellant Lynn withdrew from the appeal in this court, and this opinion is, therefore, confined to the errors urged by the remaining appellants, who raise two fundamental questions. First, is the doctrine in Griffin v. California (1965), 14 L. Ed. 2d 106, applicable to cases pending on appeal at the time of its pronouncement?

*108The second question is whether comment by the prosecuting attorney in relation to the failure of one of several joint defendants to testify in a criminal tidal constitutes prejudicial error in relation to those defendants who did testify.

At the time of the trial in 1963,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. City of Toledo v. ReasonoverOhio Supreme Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. ThompsonOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Willis Leroy v. R.C. Marshall, Supt.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  4. State v. MoritzOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. ColonOhio Supreme Court · 2008

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API