Willis Leroy v. R.C. Marshall, Supt.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ENGEL, Circuit Judge.
The issue in this habeas corpus appeal is whether the failure of a defendant’s state trial counsel to include a given constitutional issue among those issues raised in his direct appeal to the state’s appellate courts evokes the “deliberate by-pass” rule of Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 83 S.Ct. 822, 9 L.Ed.2d 837 (1963) or the “cause and prejudice” rule of Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72, 97 S.Ct. 2497, 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977). 1 We hold that the “cause and prejudice” rule applies to this procedural default, and affirm the judgment of the district court upon this alternative…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by159 opinions
- Robert A. Prather v. John Rees, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Don Michael Dever v. Kansas State Penitentiary, the State of Kansas, Attorney General of KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- William Junior Hughes v. Idaho State Board of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Eley v. BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Tony Caldwell v. Harry K. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.