State v. Thompson
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The instant appeal presents this court with numerous issues concerning appellant’s conviction and the penalty of death which was subsequently imposed. For the reasons discussed infra, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals with regard to appellant’s conviction, but reverse the judgment of the court of appeals as to appellant’s death sentence.
I
We begin our analysis by considering appellant’s propositions of law which challenge the validity of his conviction for aggravated murder.
In appellant’s first proposition of law, he asserts that his conviction must be reversed because the…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by331 opinions
- State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. LandrumOhio Supreme Court · 1990
326 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.