Shearer v. Davis
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment in favor of defendants after trial before the court without a jury, in an action for an accounting and dissolution of an alleged joint venture, plaintiff appeals.
The evidence being viewed in the light most favorable to the defendants (respondents), and pursuant to the rules set forth in Estate of Isenberg, 63 Cal.App.2d 214, 216 et seq. [146 P.2d 424], the essential facts are:
In July, 1934,.plaintiff and defendant.David Davis, hereinafter referred to as defendant, formed a joint venture to test and develop a tandem arrangement of an airplane foil or wing which could be evolved…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kennedy v. IsenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Zeibak v. NasserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Bayer v. BayerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Brooks v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Caulkins v. LavigneMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by11 opinions
- Green v. KensingerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Sibert v. ShaverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Cunningham v. DeMordaigleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Glassell v. PrentissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Meherin v. MeherinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.