Legal Opinion

Bayer v. Bayer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 26, 1926PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMerrell, J.

This controversy concerns the purchase made by the defendant on August 13, 1919, of seventy-six shares of stock *456of the Montville Finishing Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of New Jersey, from the two holders of said purchased stock, William R. Booth and John J. Healion.

For several years prior to June 11, 1919, the plaintiffs and the defendant were copartners in business, under the firm name of Bayer Brothers, engaged in the purchase of cotton goods in an unfinished state or, as they were known, “ in the grey.” These goods were either resold in their raw state to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Latta v. KilbournSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Mahr v. Norwich Union Fire Insurance SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Kennedy v. . PorterNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Struthers v. . PearceNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. McKenzie v. DickinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Scholastic, Inc. And Scholastic Productions, Inc. v. Robert Harris and Harris Entertainment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  2. In re the Arbitration between Silverberg & SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Shandell v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Ebker v. Tan Jay International Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  5. McCall v. FramptonNew York Supreme Court · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API