Legal Opinion

Zeibak v. Nasser

California Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1938No. S. F. 15659PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Plaintiff brought this action for dissolution of a partnership or joint venture, theretofore entered into between him and defendants, for an accounting, and if necessary, a sale of the partnership property.

The pertinent facts involved herein are summarized as follows: On or about December 12, 1931, and prior to January 11, 1932, plaintiff and defendants William N. Nasser, Elias Nasser, L. G. Dolliver and Central California Theatres Company (a corporation, organized and owned by seven Nasser brothers, among whom were William and Elias), entered into an oral agreement whereby they…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gray v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Keiswetter v. RubensteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Zimmerman v. HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Elliott v. Murphy Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Freeman v. DonohoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Cahill Bros., Inc. v. Clementina Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Sime v. MaloufCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. MacIsaac v. PozzoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Gherman v. ColburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Bank of California v. ConnollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API