Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. DeMordaigle

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 26, 1947No. Civ. 15899PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment in favor of plaintiff after trial before the court without a jury decreeing that he is entitled to $3,900 to be paid “only out of funds on deposit or other assets of” a joint venture, defendants appeal.

The conceded facts are these:

On February 25, 1946, the trial court entered an interlocutory judgment finding that plaintiff and defendants were joint venturers. A reference was ordered for the purpose of an accounting. An accounting was had and when returned to the court, objections were filed thereto. After a hearing of the proposed accounting and objections thereto the trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zeibak v. NasserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Dukes v. KelloggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Shearer v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gherman v. ColburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Stodd v. GoldbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Lau v. Valu-Bilt Homes, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Martyn v. LeslieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Stilwell v. TrutanichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API