Legal Opinion
Roloff v. Taste of Minnesota
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 11, 1992No. C0-92-750PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
An injured festival patron appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to file a supplemental complaint to garnish the festival’s insurer after the entry of a stipulated judgment on the personal injury claim.
FACTS
Ronald Roloff was injured in a fight at the 1987 Taste of Minnesota festival sponsored by the St. Paul Downtown Council. He and his wife brought suit against the person who injured him and the organizers of the event, including the Council. The complaint alleged that the Council was negligent in failing to provide adequate security. American Empire Surplus…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Trondson v. JanikulaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Illinois Employers Insurance v. DragovichMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Ross v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- United National Insurance Company v. Entertainment Group, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Liquor Liability Joint Underwriting Ass'n v. Hermitage InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Century Transit Systems, Inc. v. American Empire Surplus Lines InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- American Commerce Insurance v. PortoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- Forsman v. Blues Brews and Bar-B-Ques Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- SECURA Supreme Insurance Company v. MSMCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.