Legal Opinion
Ross v. City of Minneapolis
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 7, 1987No. CX-87-241PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MULALLY, Judge.
In this action arising out of a claim for negligence, the trial court granted a summary judgment against the defendants’ insurer, finding coverage. The insurer ap peals, contending that it provided no coverage for the plaintiffs claim. We reverse.
FACTS
On October 4, 1981, respondent Eddie Ross attended wrestling matches at the Minneapolis Auditorium, which is owned by respondent City of Minneapolis (City). The matches were sponsored by respondent Minneapolis Boxing and Wrestling Club (Club). As he was leaving the auditorium, Ross was physically assaulted by unidentified…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Bobich v. OjaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Bankert Ex Rel. Habush v. Threshermen's Mutual Ins.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Illinois Employers Insurance v. DragovichMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Liquor Liability Joint Underwriting Ass'n v. Hermitage InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Century Transit Systems, Inc. v. American Empire Surplus Lines InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- American Commerce Insurance v. PortoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- Forsman v. Blues Brews and Bar-B-Ques Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Berg v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.