Legal Opinion
SECURA Supreme Insurance Company v. MSM
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 2, 2008No. A07-1736PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Appellant Jaclyn Patricia Larson brought negligence claims against the insureds of respondent SECURA Supreme Insurance Company based on injuries that she sustained when the insureds’ son attacked her. SECURA subsequently commenced a declaratory-judgment action, seeking to establish that it had no duty to indemnify its insureds against Larson’s claim due to a criminal-act exclusion in the insureds’ homeowners’ insurance policy. The district court agreed that the exclusion barred coverage and granted SECU-RA’s motion for summary judgment. Larson now challenges that…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. PeasleyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Lobeck v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Allstate Insurance v. PeasleyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Watson v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Michelle Postell v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- Minkler v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Progressive Northern Insurance v. McDonoughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Co-Operative Insurance Companies v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- Forsman v. Blues Brews and Bar-B-Ques Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.