Legal Opinion

Oregon v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 20, 2026No. 26-01472 26-01606Published

1Opinion of the Court

Slip Op. 26-53 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, Before: Mark A. Barnett, Claire R. Kelly, and Timothy C. Stanceu, Judges v. Court No. 26-01472-3JP UNITED STATES, ET AL., Defendants. BURLAP AND BARREL, INC., ET AL., Plaintiffs, Before: Mark A. Barnett, Claire R. Kelly, v. and Timothy C. Stanceu, Judges UNITED STATES, ET AL., Court No. 26-01606-3JP Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER [Denying Defendants’ motion for a stay of enforcement of the judgment pending appeal.] Dated: May 20, 2026 Freeman E. Halle, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Azar v. Allina Health ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API