Legal Opinion
Azar v. Allina Health Services
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 3, 2019No. 17-1484PublishedCited by 205 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gorsuch
*1808One way or another, Medicare touches the lives of nearly all Americans. Recognizing this reality, Congress has told the government that, when it wishes to establish or change a "substantive legal standard" affecting Medicare benefits, it must first afford the public notice and a chance to comment. 42 U.S.C. § 1395hh(a)(2). In 2014, the government revealed a new policy on its website that dramatically-and retroactively-reduced payments to hospitals serving low-income patients. Because affected members of the public received no advance warning and no chance to comment first, and because the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Epic Systems Corp. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Law v. SiegelSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Batterton v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by205 opinions
- Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of Univ. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Intel Corp. Investment Policy Comm. v. SulymaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- William Bracey v. Superintendent Rockview SCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- Wages and White Lion Invst v. FDACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- Brian Iverson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
200 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.