Legal Opinion

Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 2, 1952No. 744PublishedCited by 1,623 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

We are asked to decide whether the President was acting within his constitutional power when he issued an order directing the Secretary of Commerce to take possession of and operate most of the Nation’s steel mills. The mill owners argue that the President’s order amounts to lawmaking, a legislative function which the Constitution has expressly confided to the Congress and not to the President. The Government’s position is that the order was made on findings of the President that his action was necessary to avert a national catastrophe which would inevitably result from a stoppage of steel…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. United States v. North American Transportation & Trading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Hooe v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1952
  5. Sawyer v. United States Steel Co. And Nine Other CasesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952

3Cited by1,623 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Hamdi v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

1,618 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API