Dewey v. Kimball
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Application by Maria Dewey in the district court for St. Louis county to have the title to certain land registered. From a judgment and decree, Ensign, J., directing the registration of said land, free of encumbrance, in the name of applicant; and from an order, Cant, J., denying a motion to vacate said decree and for leave to answer, National Bond & Security Company appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
This proceeding was under the provisions of Laws 1901, p. 348 (c. 237) (the Torrens law), and there are two appeals — one from the decree of confirmation of title and registration, under section 27, and the other from an order denying a motion of the National Bond & Security Company (hereinafter designated as the “Bond Company”) to vacate and set aside this decree, and for leave to file a duly-verified answer in response to a summons published in the proceeding, in which summons Maria Dewey was named as plaintiff, and “M. L. Kimball and all other persons or parties unknown, claiming any…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ware v. EastonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Reed v. SiddallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
3Cited by8 opinions
- Baart v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Riley v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Rael v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- White v. AinsworthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
- Jeurissen v. HarbeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.