Reed v. Siddall
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Application by Selina Reed in the district court for Hennepin county to have the title to land, registered. Upon the report of the referee summons directed to defendant Frederick W. Siddall, and other persons unknown, was issued and served, and a decree in favor of plaintiff was entered by default. Thereafter NelsonTuthill Lumber Company and others claiming liens upon the premises, moved to vacate the decree and for leave to answer.
Read the full summary
Application by Selina Reed in the district court for Hennepin county to have the title to land, registered. Upon the report of the referee summons directed to defendant Frederick W. Siddall, and other persons unknown, was issued and served, and a decree in favor of plaintiff was entered by default. Thereafter NelsonTuthill Lumber Company and others claiming liens upon the premises, moved to vacate the decree and for leave to answer. Defendant Siddall appeared upon the hearing of the motion and applied for leave to defend. From an order, McGee, J., vacating the decree as to the lien claimants…
1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.
On April 29, 1902, Selina Eeed made application, under Laws 1901, p. 348 (c. 237), (“Torrens system” of land transfers), to have the title to lot 7, block 4, and lots 10 and 11, block 5, in Island Park addition to Minneapolis, registered. Frederick P. Siddall and unknown parties were named defendants. The summons and application were personally served upon Siddall and on the unknown parties by publication, as required by the statute. There being no appearance within proper time, and the law in all respects having-been complied with, judgment was entered in favor of the applicant (designated…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex rel. Douglas v. WestfallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rael v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Dewey v. KimballSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Reed v. SiddallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Rael v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994