SPX CORP. v. Doe
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
MANOS, District Judge.
On July 31, 2002, John Doe, defendant, filed a Motion To Dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) (Docket No. 18). The parties have fully briefed these issues. For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED. Accordingly, this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs.
I. FACTS
SPX Corp., plaintiff, is a global provider of various technical and industrial products and services. The Defendant is an individual who, though represented by counsel, has not revealed his true identity. (Complaint at ¶¶ 2 and 3.)
This action…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Carolyn Morgan v. Church's Fried ChickenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- In Re Delorean Motor Company, Debtor. David W. Allard, Jr. v. Howard L. Weitzman, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Doe v. CahillSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Portia Boulger v. James WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Croce v. N.Y. Times Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018
- White Mule Co. v. ATC LEASING CO. LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- Mooney v. AXA Advisors, L.L.C.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.