Legal Opinion

Ranft v. Young

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1893No. 1368PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the State of Nevada, Eureka county. A. L. Fitzgerald, District Judge. I. The language of the statute (Gen. Stats. Sec. 3160) made it imperative upon the court to grant the order asked for vacating and discharging the attachment.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the District Court of the State of Nevada, Eureka county. A. L. Fitzgerald, District Judge. I. The language of the statute (Gen. Stats. Sec. 3160) made it imperative upon the court to grant the order asked for vacating and discharging the attachment. In California, under an identical statute, the supreme court has held that a judgment in favor of defendant operates as a dissolution of the attachment and gives the defendant the absolute control and right to dispose of the property relieved of any claim or lien. (O’Connor v. Blake, 29 Cal. 312; Loveland v. Mining Go., 76 Cal. 562.)…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Murphy, C. J.:

We learn from the record in this case that on the 6th day of May, 1892, the respondent commenced her action, and caused a writ of attachment to be issued, under and by virtue of which the sheriff of Eureka county levied upon and took into his possession property of the defendant of the value of one thousand eight hundred dollars. That on the 13th day of August, 1892, the said cause was tried, and judgment rendered that the plaintiff take nothing by her action, and that the defendant have judgment for his costs. On the 23d day of August, 1892, the defendant, after…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McReady v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 1871
  2. O'Connor v. BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Loveland v. Alvord Consolidated Quartz Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Ryan Drug Co. v. PeacockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  5. Anderson v. LandWashington Supreme Court · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Green v. HooperNevada Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Ex Rel. Hatch v. CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Nichols v. IngramOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Thompson v. GroveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Henderson v. DrakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API