Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mutual Refining Co. v. Union Refining Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 18, 1927No. 14378Published

1DissentRiley, J.

I dissent to the view of the majority as expressed in the opinion of this court speaking through the Honor-able Vice Chief Justice Branson.

The syllabus of the majority opinion reads, in part, as follows:

“An instruction which is intended to go to the law of the case, which indicates to the jury that it might find for the plaintiff on the doctrine of innocent purchaser for value without notice,' whereas same was never pleaded, and there was no evidence before the jury which as a matter of law would give plaintiff the benefit of such doctrine, a verdict based thereon must be set aside. ”

I…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Schulenberg v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Payne v. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  3. Union Stock-Yards & Transit Co. v. Western Land & Cattle Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1893
  4. Eureka Iron & Steel Works v. BresnahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Mather v. HutchinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API