Legal Opinion

State v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 28, 2001No. 98048756C; A106134PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*235WOLLHEIM, J.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for second-degree sexual abuse. ORS 163.425. He raises three assignments of error. Defendant argues first that he is entitled to a new trial because his trial, which was held within the confines of the Snake River Correctional Institution (SRCI) in a room that was not open to the public, violated constitutional provisions that entitle him to a public trial. Second, defendant argues that he is entitled to a new trial because the trial court erred in permitting the victim to testify from a remote location via a speakerphone during defendant’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Priest v. PearceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State Ex Rel. Oregonian Publishing Co. v. DeizOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. OsborneOregon Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lilly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
  2. State v. KellUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. United States v. Cabrera-GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Harper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2004
  5. State v. CavanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API