Legal Opinion
United States v. Cabrera-Gutierrez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 3, 2013No. 12-30233PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge TASHIMA; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge CALLAHAN.
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
ORDER
Defendanh-Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing is granted. The Opinion, filed June 3, 2013, and reported at 718 F.3d 873, is withdrawn and replaced by the Amended Opinion and concurring and dissenting opinion filed concurrently with this Order. The petition for rehearing en banc is denied as moot. Further petitions for panel rehearing and/or rehearing en banc may be filed with respect to the Amended Opinion.
OPINION
Our original Opinion was filed on June 3, 2013. See United States…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- National Federation of Independent Business v. SebeliusSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Carlos Rendon v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Gabriel Almanza-Arenas v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. MoralesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Allon AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.