Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Davis v. Cleary

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 1991No. 61370PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Krupansky, Chief Justice.

Relator, Christopher Davis, commenced this mandamus action against respondent, Judge Patricia Cleary of the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County, to compel her to vacate his sentences for various firearm specifications as well as an indefinite sentence. The gravamen of his claim is that the judge did not follow the law of the case doctrine when she resentenced him after this court remanded the case. Judge Cleary has moved to dismiss the mandamus, and in response Davis has moved for summary judgment. For the following reasons, this court grants the judge’s motion…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State ex rel. Ney v. NiehausOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Hawley v. RitleyOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Crandall, Pheils & Wisniewski v. DeCessnaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. GageNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. State ex rel. Crandall, Pheils & Wisniewski v. DeCessnaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. GageNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Doe v. Cub Foods of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API