State v. Murphy
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Re snick, J.
The issue before this court is whether the firearm specification in R.C. 2929.71 can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt without actually presenting scientific or direct evidence as to the *208operability of the firearm. This court recently held in State v. Gaines (1989), 46 Ohio St. 3d 65, 545 N.E. 2d 68, at the syllabus, that “R.C. 2923.11(B) and 2929.71(A) require that, prior to imposition of an additional term of three years’ actual incarceration for possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the firearm was operable or could…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. GainesOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. MillettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- State v. GanttSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- State v. HillisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. BrooksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. ReynoldsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. MannOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. MesserOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. GestOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.