Legal Opinion

Hawley v. Ritley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1988No. 86-1992PublishedCited by 136 opinions

1Per curiam

The determinative issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial court, on remand, acted beyond the scope of the decision and mandate rendered by the first reviewing court of appeals. While we view the cause sub judice as presenting a close question, we believe that the court of appeals below correctly applied the “law of the case” doctrine in reversing the jury verdict and judgment awarded by the trial court on remand. Accordingly, for the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Appellant Ritley raises many arguments urging a reversal of the court of appeals’…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Briggs v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. State ex rel. Special Prosecutors v. JudgesOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State ex rel. Potain v. MathewsOhio Supreme Court · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by136 opinions

  1. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. City of Hubbard ex rel. Creed v. SaulineOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. WatsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Transamerica Insurance v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State ex rel. Crandall, Pheils & Wisniewski v. DeCessnaOhio Supreme Court · 1995

131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API