Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Crandall, Pheils & Wisniewski v. DeCessna

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1995No. 1995-0064PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 73 Ohio St.3d 180.] THE STATE EX REL. CRANDALL, PHEILS & WISNIEWSKI ET AL., v. DECESSNA, JUDGE. [Cite as State ex rel. Crandall, Pheils & Wisniewski v. DeCessna,

1995-Ohio-98.] Prohibition and procedendo restraining judge from exercising any jurisdiction to vary the mandate of the court of appeals and compelling judge to carry out the mandate by holding a trial on sole issue of damages—Writs granted, when—Appellate procedure—Law-of-the-case doctrine applied. (No. 95-64—Submitted June 6, 1995—Decided August 16, 1995.) IN PROHIBITION…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hawley v. RitleyOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Potain v. MathewsOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State ex rel. Fowler v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State Ex Rel. Davey v. OwenOhio Supreme Court · 1937

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Caszatt v. GibsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Henderson v. SaffoldOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State ex rel. Lusane v. PittmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State ex rel. Reyes v. PittmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API