Maudsley v. Pederson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDSON, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s dismissal of her medical-malpractice claim against respondent. Appellant contends that respondent’s 15- to 17-hour delay in diagnosing and treating her eye infection caused her to lose vision in one eye. Respondent moved to dismiss the action pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 145.682 (2002), contending that appellant’s expert affidavit failed to detail a chain of causation. Appellant contested the motion, arguing that respondent’s motion- was untimely under Minn. R. Gen Pract. 115.03 and the court’s scheduling order and that the expert…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Lindberg v. Health Partners, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Stroud v. Hennepin County Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Anderson v. RengacharySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Teffeteller v. University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Schmitz v. RINKE, NOONANCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Allan M. Schreier v. Drealan Kvilhaug Hoefker & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Judith Rygwall, as Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Amy Rygwall v. ACR Homes, Inc. d/b/a ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
- Michael D. Holmes v. Eastern Maine Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
- Lorenzen v. Pinnacol AssuranceColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.